Proposal for a Paper
6th ISER Symposium, South Africa: 18 - 30 July 2010
Dr T.A. Ogina
Lecturer, University of Pretoria
firstname.lastname@example.org, Tel 0124202445/0721289958, Fax 0124203581.
Title: TEACHERS AS CAREGIVERS: MANAGING THE NEEDS OF VULNERABLE CHILDREN.
This paper discusses a study that explored the way in which teachers perceive and describe their roles in responding to the emerging needs of orphaned learners to evaluate whether the teachers are able to cope with the challenge of caring for the orphaned learners. The participants in the study were three secondary and two primary school teachers in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. The data on the teachers’ experiences were collected through semi-structured interviews. The study identified a lack of material, social and emotional support for grieving learners. The findings revealed that, there was lack of consensus among the teachers about their caregiving role. Although some of the teachers attempted to fulfil some of the needs of the orphaned learners, most were unable to cope with the combined roles of teaching and learning and care giving. The implications of the findings are that there is a need for teacher development in terms of preparing teachers to provide pastoral care for orphaned learners and other vulnerable children. The paper argues that in order for the teachers’ efforts to be more fruitful, there is an urgent need for supportive and effective school leadership. In addition, more counsellors and social workers need to be appointed to work in collaboration with the teachers to better provide for the needs of the vulnerable children.
Key words: teachers role; care giving; vulnerable children; orphaned learners; needs; effective leadership; pastoral role.
Evidence in literature indicates that child-headed families and orphanhood are becoming common phenomena in many African countries as a result of the increased death rate among young parents (Makame, Ani & Grantham-McGregory, 2002; Nyambedha, Wandibba & Aagaard-Hansen, 2003; Abebe & Aase, 2007; Cluver & Gardner, 2007; Kidman, Petrow & Heymann, 2007; Oleke et al., 2007; Van Wyk & Lemmer, 2007; Robson & Kanyanta, 2007; Taylor & Kvalsvig, 2008; Thurman et al., 2008). It has been estimated that 14 million children have been orphaned by HIV/AIDS, the majority (95%) in sub-Saharan Africa (UNAIDS, 2004). The increasing number of orphans in most African countries presents certain challenges in the absence of parents who are generally expected to fulfil their children’s physical, social and psychological needs, such as providing love, affection and a sense of belonging (Berger, 2000; USAID, 2000). Furthermore, parents play a supportive role in their children’s learning experiences (Epstein, 2001; Jarolimek, Foster & Kellough, 2001) such that, when a child is orphaned, a gap may be created in the child’s support structure and learning experiences. Some studies have described children without parents as being vulnerable and usually traumatised by their parents’ death, which is often followed by a change in their living conditions (Makame et al., 2002; Nyambedha et al., 2003; Chitiyo, Changara & Chitiyo, 2008). Orphaned children are frequently deprived of material and psychosocial support (Cluver et al., 2007; Foster & Williamson, 2000; Giese, Meintjes, Croke & Chamberlain, 2003; Robson & Sylvester, 2007; SCOPE-OVC/Zambia, 2003; Van Wyk & Lemmer, 2007) as a result there is a need to address some of these concerns to ensure that these children gain the full benefits of their educational experiences. Teachers are at the coalface of the orphan situation. Increasingly, teachers and schools in most African countries are expected to respond to the changing educational, social and economic environment and the contextual realities of schooling, and this includes caring for the orphaned learners. The South African Department of Education Norms and Standards for Educators (2000) stipulate pastoral role as one of the seven roles of an educator. Despite the expectation of caregiving role, the way in which teachers understand their role in terms of pastoral care, and their willingness and readiness to take up this role needs further research due to different contextual realities and the emerging needs of orphans (Schierhout et al., 2004: McBride, 2002). The purpose of this paper is to explore the role that teachers play and the support provided by the school principals in providing for some of the orphaned learners’ needs, based on the experiences of the five teachers interviewed.
Care for the orphans
In most African countries, including South Africa, the majority of orphans are cared for within the extended family and the community, especially in rural areas where the traditional culture of child rearing is sustained (Urassa, Boerma, Ng’weshemi, Isingo, Schapink & Kumogola, 1997; Foster & Williamson, 2000 Nyambedha et al., 2003; Oleke et al., 2007). However, more recent studies on orphan care in Africa have revealed that the extended family networks are becoming weaker as both the number of orphans and the high mortality rate among adults increase (Foster & Williamson, 2000; Beard, 2005; Freeman & Nkomo, 2006; Kidman et al., 2007; Heymann et al., 2007; Van Wyk & Lemmer, 2007). In addition, extended family members seem increasingly unable to balance meeting the orphans’ need for essential care with work in order to survive economically. A survey carried out by Heymann and others (2007) on the way extended families balance providing orphans with care with their work revealed that nearly half of the extended families had difficulty in meeting the orphans’ needs in addition to those of their own children owing to the demands of their work, economic and social needs.
There is consensus in literature regarding the role that the school could play in providing care for the orphans in the absence of family support (USAID, 2001; McBride, 2002; Giese et al., 2003; Richter, 2003; Loots & Mnguni, 2006; Van Wyk & Lemmer, 2007), yet what seems inadequately addressed in these studies is the role of teachers as caregivers, and the conflict that ensues when attempting to combine the role of providing care with that of teaching and learning. The assumption underpinning this study is based on the views of Epstein (2002) and Miller (1990) who theorised that, in educating a child, one cannot separate the emotional and social factors from cognitive factors, as they are interrelated. This implies that during the teaching and learning process teachers are expected to be able to deal with the intellectual, emotional and social aspects of a child’s development. In cases of orphanhood, teachers may be the adults to whom the orphans can turn to for the fulfilment of the needs normally met by parents (Zappulla, 1997; Van Wyk & Lemmer, 2007). Moreover, “Teachers are in contact with the learners throughout their working day and often have to deal with problems when they arise before seeking a specialist’s help” (Cleave et al. 1999), hence, the need for pastoral care becomes crucial in schools with orphans who are experiencing the absence of parental care and unfulfilled needs.
Pastoral care is not a separate activity but is part of teaching practice, which recognises that intellectual and social development, cannot be accomplished without taking account of both internal factors (personality, character and emotions) and external factors (social and environmental) (Best, 2007). The South African Department of Education (2000) Norms and Standards identify seven roles for the teacher and the competences within each role. The Community, Citizenship and Pastoral role is one of the seven roles and it requires teachers to “demonstrate the ability to develop a supportive and empowering environment for the learner and respond to the educational and other needs of learners and fellow teachers”. The practical competences of the pastoral role include demonstrating care, protection and the holistic development of the child. Despite the fact that the Norms and Standards stipulate the role of pastoral care, support initiatives for orphaned learners needs to be further investigated (Schierhout et al., 2004).
Contextualising the study
This paper is based on data collected for a doctoral study from five teachers between the ages of 35 and 45 who were purposely chosen by means of a snowballing process. The process involved interviewing first one teacher who then recommended another teacher to be interviewed and so on. The teachers involved in the study were teachers known by other teachers to be involved with orphaned learners. Two participants were drawn from a primary school and three from a secondary school, with 112 and 126-orphaned learners respectively. The two schools are situated in a rural area of Mpumalanga province in South Africa. According to the teachers interviewed, the mortality rate in the community is high. A 2000 antenatal survey (South Africa HIV & AIDS Statistics Summary, Department of Water Affairs, 2007) reported the HIV/AIDS prevalence in Mpumalanga to be the second highest in South Africa (29.2%). The majority of learners in this area come from households with an income of less than R18, 000 per annum (State of Environment in South Africa – Mpumalanga – Poverty and Vulnerability, 2005). Other poverty indicators are unemployment and a lack of basic facilities such as sanitation, electrification and water.
Face-to-face in-depth interviews and follow-up interview questions were used to capture data on the ways in which teachers describe their caring role while responding to the needs of orphaned learners. The interviews were used in order to understand the experiences of the teachers and the meaning they attach to the experiences through probing and obtaining feedback from the participants. In the initial interviews, The researcher asked the teachers to talk about their experiences with orphaned learners. Other interview questions were:
1. How do they identify the orphans?
2. Do the orphans talk about their experiences or not?
3. What do the teachers do when the learners tell them about their needs?
4. Are school principals and other teachers involved in helping orphaned learners?
The questions were open-ended to elicit the teachers’ perceptions and stories of their experiences. The researcher interviewed each participant twice for approximately 45 minutes to an hour. In the second interview, the researcher modified the interview questions based on the themes that emerged from the first interview. The follow-up interviews were carried out for verification and clarification of the data. The interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. The verbatim transcripts produced from the interviews were coded and the codes grouped into categories. From these categories a number of themes emerged, including identifying the needs of orphaned learners, teachers’ perceptions of their roles, role conflict, and the perceptions of leadership involvement in managing the needs of orphans. To enhance trustworthiness of the data, the teachers who were interviewed were given interview transcripts and the emerging themes to verify the accuracy and interpretation of the data. Transcripts of data analysis were also peer reviewed to verify the integrity of the data.
Identifying the needs of orphaned learners
The majority of the teachers interviewed identified food, school uniforms and money to pay for school requirements as being the learners’ most basic needs. One secondary school teacher described the situation as follows:
When I arrived in this school, I noticed that during break a lot of the kids were not eating and after break others were playing truant. When I tried to find out why they were not at school after break, I discovered that most of them were hungry.
This finding is consistent with the report of De Witt and Lessing (2005) derived from their quantitative study using questionnaires administered to 120 teachers from a number of different schools. Their findings revealed that lack of food and clothing was the most pressing problem. However, emotional needs are not as visible as material needs and teachers revealed that they struggled to identify the orphaned learners’ emotional needs and had to rely on what the learners tell them. Unfortunately, not all learners are willing to talk to teachers about their experiences, perhaps as a result of the stigma and discrimination associated with death in the context of HIV/AIDS. The case study of Chitiyo and others’ (2008) on psychological support for children orphaned by AIDS reported that all the children in the study showed signs of emotional deprivation and this affected their learning. Providing orphans with emotional support seemed to be a challenging task for the teachers in the study under discussion. One of the teachers explained as follows:
There is only one that I know who is very sensitive about it. I think that reason is that it is not too long since they have been orphaned. She is still feeling it just as raw as it is. The others most of them were orphaned at an early stage, when they were still not aware of what life is. They had to accept the fact that they do not have parents and granny is taking care of them. In fact all of them are not acknowledging it. They are trying to keep it inside. They try hard to be like other learners, in fact that is what we emphasise to them.
The extract suggests that the teachers’ understanding of the grieving process is that it is a temporary emotional state. The fact that the learners are being encouraged to hide their emotions may mean that the teacher is attempting to avoid their experiencing further trauma as a result of possible stigmatisation by other learners. A study conducted in northern Uganda on the constraints to orphans’ educational opportunities reported that teachers interviewed were of the opinion that providing special support for orphans in school could foster stigmatisation (Oleke, Blystad, Fylkesnes & Tumwine, 2007). Another possible explanation of the teachers’ response could be a lack of emotional capability to support the learners. Abebe and Aase (2007) describe emotional capability as the willingness and the ability of a caregiver to give psychological and emotional support. In relation to the orphaned learners’ emotional needs, several of the teachers indicated that a number of orphans had behavioural problems. The following narration illustrates this:
Some become violent. Maybe you find that their friends are teasing them when they are playing. They will take the teasing seriously. It seems that there is anger inside them. So, when they start teasing, the learner will react violently and automatically somebody will have some blood moving out of the body.
Grieving children’s emotional outbursts are not unique to this study; in another study, Willis (2002) identifies withdrawal and violent behaviour as common signs of mourning. This finding implies that some of the orphans in this study could still be mourning the death of their parent/s – hence the violent behaviour. The findings of a study on barriers to the community support of orphans and vulnerable youth in Rwanda also revealed that community members perceived orphans as troublemakers, describing their behaviour as unruly and disruptive (Thurman, Snider, Boris, Kalisa, Nyirazinyoye & Brown, 2008). Dowdney (2002) agrees with this finding, revealing that one in five bereaved children is likely to manifest emotional and behavioural symptoms in the form of anxiety, depression, anger, outbursts and regression.
Role of teachers
The teachers interviewed perceived their roles in different ways. One of the teachers felt that the role of providing care should be the responsibility of the government. She said:
I would prefer that somebody give them food and pay school funds for them. I think the Social Welfare Department should see to such kids.
Another teacher indicated that caring for the orphaned learners is not the responsibility of teachers per se, but the choice of the individual teacher. She was of the opinion that the school system does not endorse care for orphaned learners as part of teachers’ responsibilities and further argued that, as a result of individual differences, some teachers were more compassionate towards the orphans than others. The teacher explained:
I think that the other teachers don’t want to be involved because they just feel that it is not their problem. This is not really part of what we should be doing. It is what you feel. When you are at home and you are eating and there is food that is left and you know what is happening out there, it troubles my heart. That is why you go out to help. This is not a feeling everybody has, so you cannot condemn those who do not help.
In contrast, another teacher perceived the role of providing care as the responsibility of all teachers. She appeared to ascribe the lack of teachers’ response to the needs of the learners to a lack of dedication. She felt that other teachers who were prepared to let her take responsibility were exploiting her and she challenged them to be more responsive in providing care.
Learners come to me. It became my job. I do not feel pain, I do not ask for contribution from the other teachers. Other teachers when it comes to the problem of orphaned learners they push the orphans to me. “Go to Teacher Khumalo she will help you”. I asked, “why can’t you help, why do you always send the learners to me?”
Owing to the differing perceptions of the role of providing care, the teachers’ commitment to this task varies. Some teachers provide food, clothes and emotional support in terms of guidance and counselling. One of the teachers told how she responded to the needs of a sexually abused learner by facilitating assistance from different role players such as a medical practitioner, a social worker, a counsellor and a policewoman. She said:
The cousin raped the girl. So I called the girl and asked her whether she has been taken to the doctor. The guardian took the girl to the doctor and only asked for painkillers. I phoned the doctor and the doctor told me to take the learner to the hospital. The doctor examined the girl and she was safe. We remained convinced that the girl must be counselled, go through therapy because when she is quiet the things come back to haunt her. So I approached the hospital, they said that they need a docket number. So I took the girl to the police station to get the docket number. Thereafter is when the girl got attention from Social Welfare.
Other teachers responded to the needs of the orphaned learners by referring the learners to a third party for help. Two teachers reported:
I send them to the teachers who help orphans. The social workers usually say that we must send a list of the learners that we have here to them. We did send the list but they did not respond.
As a class teacher I have to report this to those who help the orphans like Ms Chabalala. She does it by giving them money to buy bread and soup during break.
This quote reveals that not all teachers are involved in helping orphaned learners – those who are committed seem to be internally motivated to do so. For example, one teacher was motivated to help the orphans by her background experiences and her religious beliefs. She said:
I am from a poor background. When I used to go to school the teachers would buy for me the things that I did not have like school uniform and books. I am also a Christian and I like to help people when I can. This is why I ask learners about their problems.
Another teacher also had a positive attitude towards helping orphaned learners, saying:
Every year I would buy uniform for one learner. I think I got it from my mother. When she was still alive she use to help learners.
It seems that when the two teachers reflected on their background, they were able to relate and identify their experiences and thus empathise with those of the orphaned learners. The literature reports that compassion is the key underlying factor to an individual act of kindness and care towards others (Foster & Williamson, 2000).
The teachers’ experiences indicate conflict in terms of the interpersonal relationships between the teachers and conflict in terms of the teachers’ duties and responsibilities. The differences in the perceptions of the teachers’ role and their responsibility for providing orphaned learners with care in particular appear to be causing tension and conflict within teachers. One of the teachers, for example, explained:
As teachers, we have to be social workers, parents and everything. I had to come quickly just before lunch and prepare the soup and bread for the learners on the day they have soup and bread. I had to leave class before time and leave them with work. I knew that it was not right but now the lady who works as a general worker helps me.
Another teacher said:
You know I am teaching at the same time I am dealing with the orphans at the same time I am a policewoman. I am a social worker and a counsellor.
As evidenced by this study, the emerging multiple roles of teaching and caregiving are in agreement with the findings of Schierhout et al., (2004) they reported that teachers perceive their roles, as providing food, counselling and advice, money and school fees and encouraging learners to attend school.
As indicated in the quotes, from the two teachers’ experiences it would seem that these multiple roles are demanding and that it is probably unrealistic to expect them to be taken on unless, as Evans (2002) suggests, teachers’ roles are modified and redefined to include caring for learners’ social and emotional needs. The new role definition would then imply a supportive structure that would enable teachers to carry out their responsibilities more effectively and less stressfully.
Teachers’ perceptions of the involvement of the school principal in supporting the teachers’ caregiving role
Another emerging theme from the study is the leadership role of the school management in responding to the needs of orphaned learners. From the teachers’ responses it seems that school management, specifically the principals at the two schools investigated, were not directly involved in providing for the needs of the orphaned learners. At times they supported the efforts that some of the teachers made in providing for the learners needs, but the efforts had to be from the teachers’ own initiative. In one case, for example, one teacher commented that the principal had encouraged and supported her efforts to assist the orphans. She stated:
If you go to the principal and tell her that you want to help an orphan, the principal does not block your efforts she encourages you to go ahead. Like when I was telling you that I had to come before break to prepare the lunch for the learners. I was never hassled about it. They understood that I had to do it. When the general worker came in, I asked the principal to include in her job description that the worker should help with this and she did it.
However, another teacher experienced a conflict of interest with the school management in terms of the use of donations received to support the learners. The teacher wanted to use the donated money to provide food and school uniforms for the orphans, while the school principal’s suggestion was to improve the school infrastructure of the school. The teacher explained:
When I told my principal that I got donations from the university for the orphans, she said that I must use the donations for buying computers and paving the school. But this is not the job I want to do.
It appears that there is a need for supportive and caring leadership that encourages teachers to become involved and respond positively to the needs of orphans. The experiences of the two teachers suggest uncertainty about the role of school management in terms of providing assistance for orphaned learners and the lack of a support structure.
Time constrains and the lack of teacher capacity to provide for the orphans’ needs in the absence of material and human resources seem to make it more challenging for teachers to provide care for traumatised, grieving children at school. All the teachers interviewed acknowledged this and recommended that alternative care in the form of an orphanage should be considered to provide holistically for the orphaned learners.
The results of this study indicate that teachers identified the needs of the orphaned learners as being material, social and emotional. The emotional needs were more difficult to identify and more challenging to fulfil. Teachers are considered to be frontline workers in recognising the danger signs in learners and responding immediately and effectively to them (Cleave et al., 1997). In addition, learners experiencing orphanhood may be at greater risk of emotional problems than other learners. Therefore, teachers who are not sensitised to or are unaware of the personal, social, emotional and behavioural problems which their learners as suggested in this study may experience, are not well placed to identify the learners’ non-academic problems (Best, 2007). Such teachers are more likely to be unprepared and /or unable to provide pastoral care.
“Pastoral care” is a term that can be interpreted in a variety of ways depending on the ethos of the school (Cleave et al., 1997). In some schools this is the responsibility of the entire staff, while in others it is the responsibility of a group of pastoral specialists. The findings of this study concur with Cleave and others (1997) argument that in the context of orphaned learners, although it may seem almost certainly impractical for teachers to meet some of the orphan’s needs in the absence of alternative sources of support such as social services, it may be necessary for teachers to acquire knowledge, of and skills in, the pastoral role. The teachers’ accounts reveal the need for counselling in cases of behavioural problems that may be triggered by the orphans’ emotional state or in cases of abuse such as the rape reported by one of the teachers. Although some of the learners may be in need of professional help, as alluded to by the teachers, others may benefit from the support given by teachers competent in providing pastoral care.
The current situation in some schools, as described by the teachers, necessitates them taking on multiple roles if they are to meet the material, social and emotional needs of the learners. This implies that there is a need to redefine the roles of teachers in terms of a shift from dispensing knowledge to counselling and pastoral care in order for the learners to gain maximum benefit from their educational experience. It would seem that there is a call for teachers to adapt to these new roles. The issue that needs to be addressed is the interpretation of the concept of pastoral care. In this study, teachers’ interpretation of the role of care lacked clear and shared understanding. The literature reveals that pastoral care means different things which may include teachers’ role in guidance, and counselling, spiritual guidance or a bureaucratic structure of an educational institution (Best, 1977; Chittenden, 1999; Watkins, 1999). Evans (2002) advocates for teacher development to incorporate role development that focuses on redefining and modifying the role of teachers to include caring for social and emotional needs. Although the need for skills development did not emerge directly from the teachers’ interviews in this study, in a similar study on educational opportunities for orphaned learners, some teachers expressed the need to be trained in counselling (Oleke et al., 2007). These researchers further suggest the need for teachers to acquire specialised skills if they are to provide effective emotional and social support for learners. Moreover, not all schools have trained guidance and counselling teachers and not all learners are likely to require professional help. There may be cases where teachers who are competent in pastoral care, and who have the enthusiasm, could assist the learner under stress without referring him or her to a specialist.
The findings of this study reveal that teachers’ responses to orphaned learners’ needs seem to be influenced by the perceptions of their roles and personal characteristics. Not all the teachers regarded pastoral care as being part of their responsibilities. Teachers who empathise with the orphaned learners tend to assume the care-giving role and respond by providing material and sometimes emotional support. Their motivation is based on their background experience and religious beliefs; but there were those in contrast, refer the learners to other teachers for support. Although some teachers strive to provide the orphans with food, clothes and at times emotional support, their narratives suggest a heavy workload.
In this study, it appears that the burden of supporting these learners also seems to be linked to the absence of supportive leadership. The teachers’ accounts of support or lack thereof from school leadership and management reveal a need for leadership involvement in the initiatives and a systematic structured approach towards providing for the learners’ needs. It implies from the context of this study that school leadership needs to be more sensitive to the needs of the orphaned learners, and also to be part of the whole support initiative in order for the teachers’ efforts to be more successful and less strenuous, as described by one of the teachers. It may mean that school leaders’ engagement with the activities geared to supporting the orphans could enhance the teachers’ capacity to provide pastoral care and to involve other stakeholders. One of the dilemmas mentioned by the teachers interviewed was the use of her time, which created conflict in terms of what should be given priority that is, teaching the learners or preparing their lunch.
This study focused on the experiences of five teachers. Due to the limited sample, the findings of this study cannot be generalised beyond the context of the field of study. However, the description of the context of this study may enable readers to determine the transferability of the findings to their own setting (Seale, 2000). Another limitation is the use of interviews as the only data collection method. The data collected from the interviews could not be triangulated by other methods such as document analysis and observation. The absence of other sources of data such as a response or support from the school principal or social workers made it impossible to substantiate some of the findings from the interviews. Contextual factors such as poverty, which was not explored in the study could have also influenced the way teachers respond or did not respond in providing for the needs of the learners. Despite the limitations, the emerging themes from the context of this study could contribute to understanding how teachers cope with the responsibility of providing care to orphaned learners in some schools. Further research needs to be done with a larger sample and multiple data sources to shed more light on this topic
The results of this study provide some insights into the experiences of teachers in two schools with orphaned learners in South Africa and the changing role of the teachers, leadership and management implications for the schools. It was evident from this study that some teachers are involved in some kind of pastoral care-giving activities in response to the needs of orphaned learners. Some teachers responded by providing for material needs and giving emotional support, while others referred the orphaned learners to other teachers for assistance. This is clearly a move away from the traditional role of imparting knowledge to the learners to an additional new role of providing social and emotional support for the learners, as well as counselling and pastoral care (Zappulla, 1997, De Witt & Lessing, 2005; Best, 2007; Robson & Kanyanta, 2007). The teachers who opted to provide care for the orphaned learners seem to be struggling to meet the learners’ needs in the absence of material and human resource support. This finding calls for an urgent need to redefine the role of teachers with the emphasis on caregiving aspect. It also suggests that pre-service programmes and in-service teacher development training programmes should include preparing teachers to provide pastoral care in order to increase their potential for supporting grieving children. Such programmes are likely to empower and develop the teachers’ care-giving competences and skills in providing care for orphaned learners (Evans, 2002). This study found that some teachers provided for the material needs of the orphaned learners from their own resources, and other sources. If more teachers could be involved as caregivers and work as a team to solicit material resources it would ease some of the burden of providing for the orphaned learners as described in this study.
In light of the teachers’ perception of school principals’ involvement in supporting orphaned learners in this study, it would seem that leadership in schools that aims at encouraging and supporting teachers to support their learners is crucial if teachers are to fulfil the material, emotional and social needs of the learners. At present, the teachers seem uncertain of their responsibilities in terms of care giving. This study shows that teachers expect the school principal to support them in providing for the needs of the learners. In order for the school principals to meet teachers’ expectations there is a need for training on strategies and new ways of management that embrace motivation, the provision of resources and other forms of support for the teachers’ efforts to provide pastoral care (Cleaver et al., 1997).
The teachers also acknowledged that, given the situation in their schools, the state should consider employing full-time and part-time social workers and counsellors to support these learners which would relieve the teachers of some of their multiple layers of responsibilities. However, more research needs to be done on the role of leadership in providing pastoral care and possible partnership relationships that could be established between social workers and/or counsellors with the teachers in playing the different but interdependent roles in supporting orphaned learners, and probably other learners in vulnerable situations.
From the findings of this study, one may argue that teachers are also caregivers and can never fully escape from the responsibility of helping orphans in their class. The questions that we need to ask are: what is the concern of teachers regarding caring for orphans and other vulnerable children, what motivates the teacher to provide care, what do the teachers need to do their work better?
Abebe, T. & Aase, A. (2007). Children, AIDS and politics of orphans care in Ethiopia: The extended family revisited. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 2058–2069.
Beard, B.J. (2005). Orphan care in Malawi: Current practices. Journal of Nursing, 22(2), 105–115.
Berger, E.H. (2000). Parents as partners in education (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Pearson Education.
Best, R. (2007). The whole child matters: The challenge of Every Child Matters for pastoral care. Education 3-13, 35(3), 249–259.
Chabilall, J.A. (2004). A social-educational study of the impact of HIV/AIDS on the adolescent in child-headed household. MA Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
Chitiyo, M, Changara, D.M. & Chitiyo, G. (2008). Providing psychological support to special needs children: A case of orphans and vulnerable children in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Education Development, 28, 384–392.
Chittenden, A. (1999). Teachers as carers: A case study of a secondary school’s pastoral process. Pastoral Care in Education, 17(2), 14-22.
Cleave, H., Carey, P., Norris, P., Sloper, P., While, D. & Charlton, A. (1997). Pastoral care in initial teacher education: A survey of secondary teacher education institutions. Pastoral Care in Education, 15(2), 16–21.
Cluver, L. & Gardner, F. (2007). Risk and protective factors for psychological well-being of children orphaned by AIDS in Cape Town: A qualitative study of children and caregivers’ perspectives. AIDS Care, 19(3), 318–325.
De Witt, M.W. & Lessing, A.C. (2005). Educators’ views on the needs and support of HIV/AIDS orphans in their psychological development. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 17(1), 13–22.
Department of Education. (2007). The National Policy Framework for Education and Development in South Africa: More teachers: better teachers. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Department of Education. (2000). Norms and Standards for Educators. Government Gazette, 243(21565), 22 September.
Dowdney, L. (2000). Annotation: childhood bereavement following parental death. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(17), 819–830.
Epstein, J. (2001). School, family and community partnership: preparing and improving schools. Oxford USA: Westview.
Evans, L. (2002). What is teacher development? Oxford Review of Education, 28(1), 123–137.
Foster, G. & Williamson, J. (2000). A review of literature of the impact of HIV/AIDS on children in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS, 14(3), 275–284.
Freeman, M. & Nkomo, N. (2006). Guardianship of orphans and vulnerable children: A survey of current and prospective South African caregivers. AIDS Care, 18(4), 302–310.
Giese, S., Meintjes, H., Croke, R. & Chamberlain, R. (2003). The role of schools in addressing the needs of children made vulnerable in the context of HIV/AIDS. University of Cape Town: Children’s Institute.
Heyman, J., Earle, A., Rajaraman, D., Miller, C. & Bogen, K. (2007). Extended family caring for children orphaned by AIDS: Balancing essential work and caregiving in high prevalence nations. AIDS Care, 19(3), 337–345.
Jarolimek, J., Foster, C.D. & Kellough, R.D. (2001). Teaching and learning in the elementary school (7th ed). Upper Saddle, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Kidman. R., Petrow, S.E. & Heymann, S.J. (2007). Africa’s orphan crisis: Two community-based models of care. AIDS Care 9(3), 326.
Loots, T. & Mnguni, M. (2006). Pastoral support competencies of educators subsequent to memory box making: Part of asset-based research project on school-based support. Unpublished paper, University of Pretoria: South Africa.
Makame, V., Ani, C. & Grantham-McGregory, S. (2002). Psychological well-being of orphans in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Acta Paediatrica, 91(5), 459–465.
McBride, R. (2002). Playing down presence: The importance of in-depth research for education for development. In M. Schweisfurth, L. Davis, L & C. Harber (Eds), Learning democracy and citizenship: International experiences. United Kingdom: Symposium Books.
Miller, R. (1990). What are schools for? Holistic education in American culture. Brandon, Vermont: Holistic Education Press.
Nyambedha, E.O., Wandibba, S. & Aagaard-Hansen, J. (2003). Changing patterns of orphaned care due to the HIV epidemic in Western Kenya. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 301–311.
Oleke, C., Blystad, A., Fylkesnes, K. & Tumwine, J.K. (2007). Constraints to the educational needs of orphans: A community-based study from northern Uganda. AIDS Care, 19 (3), 361–368.
Richter, L. (2003). The impact of HIV/AIDS on the development of children. Paper presented at the Institute of Security Studies Seminar – HIV/AIDS vulnerability and children: Dynamics and long-term implications for South Africa. Pretoria, 4 April 2003.
Robson, S. & Kanyanta, S.B. (2007). Moving towards inclusive education policies and practices? Basic education for AIDS orphans and other vulnerable children in Zambia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(4), 417–430.
Robson, S. & Sylvester, K.B. 2007. Orphans and vulnerable children in Zambia: The impact of HIV/AIDS epidemic on the basic education for children at risk. Educational Research, 49(3), 259–272.
Schierhout, G., Kinghorn, A., Govender, R., Mungani, J. & Morely, P. (2004). Quantifying effects of illness and death on education at school level: Implications for HIV/AIDS responses. Final report submitted for the Joint Centre for Political and Economic Studies. Health and Development Africa.
SCOPE-OVC/Zambia. (2003). Findings of orphans and vulnerable children psychological survey. USAID/Zambia: Family Health International.
Seale, C. (2000). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
South Africa HIV & AIDS statistics summary. Available online at: http://www.avert.org/safricastats.htm [Retrieved October 29, 2007].
State of the environment in South Africa. Mpumalanga poverty and vulnerability. Available online at: http://www.mpu.agric.za/SOER/Mpumalanga [Retrieved November 2, 2007].
Taylor, M & Kvalsvig, J.D. (2008). Scaling up support for children in HIV-affected families by involving early childhood development workers: Community views from Kwazulu-Natal South Africa. Development South Africa. 25(1), 61–73.
Thurman, T.R., Snider, L.A., Boris, N.W., Nyirazinyoye, L. & Brown, L. (2008). Barriers to the community support to orphans and vulnerable youth in Rwanda. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1557–1567.
UNAIDS Inter-agency Task Team on Education and HIV/AIDS. (2004). The role of education in the protection, care and support of orphans and vulnerable children living in a world of HIV and AIDS. Available online at: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php [Retrieved October 25, 2007].
Urassa, M., Boerma, T., Ng’weshemi, J.Z.L., Isingo, R., Schapink, D. & Kumogola, L. (1997). Orphanhood, child fostering and the AIDS epidemic in rural Tanzania. Health Transition Review Supplement, 7(2), 141–153.
USAID (2000). Efforts to address the needs of children affected by HIV/AIDS. Report to Congress: An overview of USAIDS development programmes and approaches. The Synergy Project. Available online at: http://wwwsynergyaids.com [Retrieved August 12, 2006].
USAID (2001). Responding to the educational needs of children and adolescents affected by AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. Report on Town Hall Meeting October 23, 2001. Available online at: http://www.synergyaids.com [Retrieved May 5, 2006].
Van Wyk, N. & Lemmer, E. (2007). Redefining home-school community partnership in South Africa in the context of HIV/AIDS pandemic. South African Journal of Education, 27(2), 301–316.
Watkins, C. (1999). The case of restructuring the UK secondary school. Pastoral Care in Education, 17(4), 3-10.
Willis, C.A. (2002). The grieving process of children: Strategies for understanding, educating and reconciling children’s perception of death. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(4), 221–226.
Zappulla, C. (1997). Suffering in silence: Educators with Aids and the moral school community. New York: Peter Lang.